The market’s constraint has moved from supply to admissibility. There is no shortage of tonnes; there is a shortage of tonnes a regulated buyer can put on a balance sheet and defend.
Three things now decide that. The first is authorisation: whether the host country will issue a corresponding adjustment under Article 6, which turns a domestic reduction into a transferable unit and removes it from the host’s own NDC accounting. Countries with tight targets are increasingly unwilling to do so, and a project without authorisation is confined to the voluntary market at voluntary prices.
The second is assurance, and it has changed character. For a decade integrity was policed by standard-setters and rating agencies — reputational instruments. It is now being policed by securities and commodities regulators, disclosure law, and statutory carbon budgets. A weak methodology used to cost a buyer credibility; it is starting to cost them a filing.
The third is delivery. A single project carries concentrated exposure to one regulatory change, one methodology revision, one fire season, one community dispute. A portfolio spread across project types and geographies smooths the outliers, which is why offtake at scale is moving toward portfolios and insurance wrappers rather than bilateral deals on single sites.
For Indonesia the implication is specific. The resource is not the binding constraint and has not been for some time: forest and peat carbon, blue carbon, and now transition credits from early coal retirement are all available in volume. What is scarce is the documentation chain — measurement that survives third-party assessment, tenure that survives scrutiny, and authorisation that survives the NDC arithmetic. Projects that build that chain first will clear at compliance prices; projects that build the asset first and the paperwork later will not clear at all.
We publish this as an occasional assessment rather than a quarterly note because the conclusions only change when the evidence does. The six classifications below are the record that assessment is drawn from.