The 2026 season escalated sharply in the second half of August and has not let up. SiPongi recorded 1,224,060 hotspots from 1 January to 17 October, and fire emissions reached 673 Mt CO2e by 15 October, two thirds of it from burning peat and 74 percent of 2015 at the same date.
The cost is now visible well beyond the burning provinces. Smoke has reached 17 provinces, including Jakarta, Banten and West Java; 2,458 domestic flights were disrupted between 11 August and 17 October; and respiratory infections in seven provinces passed 300,000. On 19 October high-confidence hotspots in Central Kalimantan jumped from 157 to 937, and fire has reached Mount Lawu and Mount Sumbing on Java. BMKG expects hot, dry weather to continue to 26 October, and the El Niño is near its peak.
The pattern the season exposed is not the one policy is built around.
In the protected-area analysis, between 13 August and 5 September, satellites recorded 31,161 high-confidence hotspots nationally. Of those, 2,067 fell inside a protected area — seven in every hundred — so most of the season’s fire is burning outside the conservation estate. But inside the estate, ten sites carry 70.4 percent of everything recorded, and legal category tracks none of it: the strictest IUCN class holds more points across more sites than the national parks do.
Two provinces hold 62 percent of the hotspots recorded inside protected areas. Papua has the volume, spread across an enormous estate; Kalimantan Tengah has the density, four times as many points per unit of protected land. The five Kalimantan provinces together hold more than half the national figure.
That combination — concentration in a small number of sites, and density rather than count as the operative measure — is what makes targeted intervention possible. Protection on paper and protection on the ground are separate things, and the difference is now measurable while the season is still running.